Preservation Society of Charleston

Media Mentions

Post and Courier: Historic Charleston mini-warehouse site sold for mixed-use development

06/15/2016 | Post and Courier: Historic Charleston mini-warehouse site sold for mixed-use development

http://www.postandcourier.com/20160614/160619675/historic-charleston-mini-warehouse-site-sold-for-mixed-use-development

By: Warren L. Wise

A downtown Charleston storage facility in a historic building surrounding an antebellum smokestack could soon see a mixed-use development sprout on the site.

An Ohio-based developer and a Charleston real estate investment firm recently bought 12 parcels on and around the site of AAA Downtown Storage at 44 Line St. in a deal valued at nearly $8.7 million.

 

The buyers aren’t outlining their specific plans for the mid-peninsula site, but an environmental cleanup plan filed with the state related to the block calls for a mix of uses, including apartments, businesses and open space.

 

Lifestyle Communities, a developer and property manager based in Columbus, Ohio, and The Seine Group of Charleston, through an Atlanta-based arm called East Line Partners LLC, bought the 294-unit storage business as well as the 2-plus acres bound roughly by Sheppard, Meeting and Line streets and an old railroad line.

Seine is a partner in the 10-story Woolfe Street apartment building rising about three blocks south of the storage site.

The purchase includes four parcels on the south side of Line Street near the unused rail line, just north of the Courier Square apartment and commercial building being constructed on property owned by the parent company of The Post and Courier.

Justin Ferira, Seine’s CEO, said it’s unclear what the use will be for the properties south of Line Street. They are currently being used as a lay-down yard on the Courier Square project.

Chad Thompson, chief marketing officer for Lifestyle Communities, said he hopes to have a better picture of the proposal in a couple of months.

The central building of the mini-storage warehouse dates back to 1857, which means the historic structure won’t be going anywhere under the city’s preservation guidelines.

“The plan is to showcase the historic building,” Ferira said.

As part of the property deal, the Preservation Society of Charleston waived a right of first refusal it had held for 32 years on the site of the historic structure at 44 Line. It retained an option to buy the property if it becomes available again.

The preservation easement is a protective mechanism the society holds on historic properties in Charleston.

“We worked with them on this acquisition, and we didn’t feel any need to utilize it in this situation,” said Kristopher King, the group’s executive director.

King said developers plan to renovate an old carpenter’s shop, which is the main building on the storage-warehouse site, and convert it to commercial use. Construction above it will not be allowed, he added.

“A storage warehouse is not the highest and best use of that property,” he said. “We are intrigued by the idea of having a public use there.”

King said also there are two vacant historic houses on Sheppard Street that the developers will have to address.

“We oppose the relocation of historic structures,” he said. “They need to show us a strong case as a benefit for having them moved.”

He added, though, that he is unsure if leaving them there is the best option.

“The onus is on them to show what is best for that property and the historic structures,” King said.

Ten of the parcels, previously owned by Hagerman Court LLC and others, sold for $7.6 million.

Two other parcels included in the deal were sold separately.

City Councilman William Dudley Gregorie sold the developers a lot at 36 Line for $425,000, while a firm called CB3 LLC sold the lot at 38 Line for $650,000, according to Charleston County property records.

Gregorie did not immediately respond to an email and phone calls for comment.

Historical records show the site closest to the rail line, developed in the mid-1800s, included an assortment of shops for blacksmiths, woodworking, machines, paint and offices. A plywood warehouse and large oil-storage room also were located on the site during the 1900s.

Because of past uses of the property and those of former nearby businesses that could have leached substances into the soil, a required environmental testing of soil samples showed some contamination above acceptable federal levels for lead, arsenic and other substances. Water samples were fine, according to the environmental study of the site.

East Line Partners has agreed to assess and manage any cleanup of the site, according to a filing with the state Department of Health and Environmental Control.

Reach Warren L. Wise at 843 937-5524 or twitter.com/warrenlancewise.

Post and Courier: Charleston's BAR denies move to relocate partially historic structure at Hughes Lumber

06/09/2016 | Post and Courier: Charleston's BAR denies move to relocate partially historic structure at Hughes Lumber

Photo: via hughesfambiz.com

http://www.postandcourier.com/20160609/160609351/charlestons-bar-denies-move-to-relocate-partially-historic-structure-at-hughes-lumber

By: Warren L. Wise

Developers will have to figure out a way to build around a partially historic structure if they plan to proceed with redevelopment of the Hughes Lumber site in downtown Charleston.

For the third time since December, the Board of Architectural Review this week shot down a move for an unencumbered path to turn the site into commercial, residential and parking use.

Developers asked the board for permission to move a structure with parts dating back to around 1860 to sites on Spring or Radcliffe streets where they maintained the reconstructed building would fit better with the surrounding community.

After hearing pleas from the a representative of the developer, a city staff member and others that moving the structure made sense, the BAR rejected the idea outright.

“I didn’t here anything except this house is in the way of a large development,” said BAR member Janette Alexander. “That piece of building needs to stay there.”

Board members Jay White and Bob Faust agreed.

White said the city has buildings “dramatically out of scale” next to each other in several places, and the historic buildings of Mary Street, an area radically altered over the years, should be maintained.

“I still firmly believe it needs to stay on the site,” he said.

White added he is not opposed to the structure being moved around on the site, but he believes it needs to stay on Mary Street.

Jeffrey Roberts of JJR Development, who doesn’t have an economic interest in the site but spoke on behalf of real estate investor Patrick Marr of CMB Property Co. Inc., said the structure could be rebuilt and revitalized in a different part of the city.

“We had to come up with a location that is better and has context where it can live with its brothers and sisters,” he told the board. “We think we have an extraordinary solution.”

Also speaking on behalf of the developer, Julia Martin said, “Given the scale of development in this part of the peninsula, it’s more respectful to move it somewhere else, not surrounded by hotels and garages.”

Preservationists decried the idea.

April Wood, of the Historic Charleston Foundation, said the applicant “can adaptively reuse the building on this location.”

Also opposing the move was the Preservation Society of Charleston.

“We feel it belongs here, and it would be a detriment to the street to move it,” said Tim Condo. “We feel that the site and the block needs this building more than the other areas.”

The city disagreed, with Dennis Dowd, the city’s architect and preservation officer, saying, “We feel it will be out of place surrounded by garages.”

With the board not budging, Roberts said it’s now a decision for those interested in the site.

“At this juncture, it’s up to the developer to incorporate the structure into the project,” he said. “The development will go on.”

Hughes Lumber and its True Value Hardware store, as well as other businesses run by the Burn family, continue to operate on the site.

Reach Warren L. Wise at 843 937-5524 or twitter.com/warrenlancewise.

Post and Courier: Sheldon Church: Keeping a ruin from further ruin

05/23/2016 | Post and Courier: Sheldon Church: Keeping a ruin from further ruin

Seven to Save - Old Sheldon Church Ruin

http://www.postandcourier.com/20160522/160529871/sheldon-church-keeping-a-ruin-from-further-ruin

05/23/2016 | Post and Courier: Letters show overwhelming opposition to new cruise ship terminal in Charleston

http://www.postandcourier.com/20160522/160529884/letters-show-overwhelming-opposition-to-new-cruise-ship-terminal-in-charleston

03/10/2016 | Post and Courier: Charleston BAR defers latest Jasper site plan, by Robert Behre

http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20160309/PC16/160309345/charleston-bar-defers-latest-jasper-site-plan 

02/06/2015 | Beach Company, Preservation Society spar over Sergeant Jasper Plans

The Beach Company's plans to redevelop the area where the Sergeant Jasper apartment building now stands is drawing fire, even though the city of Charleston hasn't yet publicly presented them.

The proposed plan for the area on Colonial Lake, which has been submitted to the city's planning department, includes 454 multi-family housing units, a 35,000-square-foot grocery store and about 700 parking spaces. The company will make a presentation on its plan to the city's Planning Commission at 5 p.m. Feb. 18, in the third-floor Meeting Room in the Charleston County School District building at 75 Calhoun St.

Tim Keane, the city's planning director, said the city hasn't decided whether it will recommend approval of the proposal, which would involve amending the city's Century V plan, which was approved in 2010 and governs land use. The proposal also includes a request to change the 6.4-acre property's zoning to a planned unit development. That sort of zoning lays out a plan for the entire development.

The Preservation Society of Charleston earlier this week issued a 10-page "Advocacy Alert," warning residents that the Beach Co.'s plan for the area on Broad Street includes intense development that's not appropriate for the historic area, and that the process by which the city plans to evaluate and approve the proposal would limit public input, said Kristopher King, the group's executive director.

Now there are only 225 residential units, 17,000 square feet of non-residential space, and 180 parking spaces on the site, according the alert.

The Beach Co. late Friday issued a statement refuting information in the society's release.

"After so many productive meetings and discussions pertaining to the future plans for The Jasper, we are disappointed to see that the Preservation Society would issue false and misleading statements to its membership, the public and local media, as outlined in their recent Position Statement and Advocacy Alert," Beach Co. President John Darby said.

Keane said the company has gathered a great deal of public input in recent years about what the public wants on the site, and it has revised its plans accordingly a few times. But he welcomes more public input on the plan. "It's a unique and sensitive site," he said.

Reach Diane Knich at 843-937-5491 or on Twitter at @dianeknich.

02/06/2015 | High rise will come down but neighbors worked up over proposed plan for sergeant jasper

CHARLESTON, SC (WCSC) - Sergeant Jasper, the high-rise apartment complex on Broad Street, will be torn down soon, but it's what could go up in its place that has neighbors concerned. The prominent property has been owned by The Beach Company since the 1950's and recently submitted its Master Plan for redevelopment.

The Beach Company is proposing 454 residential units, 35,000 square feet of retail space and a parking garage.

"The proposed plans, as it stands, is terrifying."

"It's going to impact the neighborhood dramatically."

Sergeant Jasper sits between Ashley Avenue and Barre Street, which runs parallel to Harleston Village and Luke Daniels' home.

"Barre Street is pretty quiet right now. When that development gets done, forget it. It's going to be a major thoroughfare."

"For us, it's not a traffic issue,” explains the city's planning director, Tim Keane. “It's an issue of scale and a design that's appropriate for this sensitive, unique site."

Keane says the area must be rezoned from Limited Business to a Planned Unit Development or PUD. The Planning Commission will consider the request at its next meeting on February 18.

"I have faith in the system to an extent,” says Harleston Village resident Corie Hipp Erdman. “I do not have faith in the PUD, the Planned Unit Development, as it is proposed because once that gets passed or if it gets passed on the 18, we have no more input. It's all over at that point."

Keane says the PUD is a customized set of restrictions for unique locations, like Sergeant Jasper. He says the public will have a chance to weigh in again when the recommendation goes before city council at the end of March.

"There's a lot of parameters in there that would guide that. They have to have certain setbacks, the open spaces, the parks, those kind of things, the height maximums."

Daniels says he can appreciate that the land is private property. He's hoping the new development will be a fit.

"Anybody has a right, to a certain extent, to their land. My concern is congestion, traffic. Charleston already feels like it's overrun. I have to remind myself that it doesn't take five minutes to get a across town anymore, but it takes 20 minutes."

The Beach Company released the following statement on Friday: 

Fellow Residents of Charleston,

After so many productive meetings and discussions pertaining to the future plans for The Jasper, we are disappointed to see that the Preservation Society would issue false and misleading statements to its membership, the public and local media, as outlined in their recent Position Statement and Advocacy Alert.

As we near the February 18 City of Charleston Planning Commission review of the Sergeant Jasper Planned Unit Development (PUD) Master Plan, we are continuing our dialogue with the community to ensure there is a complete and accurate understanding of the proposed plan. We are also continuing to gather feedback, which we will thoughtfully consider as we move forward with the development plan.

Since the inception of the planning process in 2006, The Beach Company has actively sought the feedback of the City, surrounding neighborhoods and community organizations with an interest in the redevelopment of the Sergeant Jasper property. The masterplan and conceptual design concepts are a direct result of dozens of public presentations.

In order for the conversation around the Sergeant Jasper PUD to be productive, we believe it must be transparent and factual. This is the reason we write you today – to clarify several inaccuracies contained within the Position Statement and Advocacy Alert from Preservation Society of Charleston.

• From the Preservation Society: “The Beach Company has submitted a PUD Master Plan for the redevelopment of the Sergeant Jasper building, which will be heard at the Wednesday, Feb.18, Planning Commission Meeting at 5 p.m., 75 Calhoun Street, 3rd Floor. Rendering does not show top floors of the middle structure, which is proposed to be seven stories (four shown).”

o The rendering supplied by the Preservation Society has been altered and misrepresents the information contained in the PUD application and public presentations. The upper floors are clearly shown on the elevations prior to being altered by Preservation Society. See attached.

• From the Preservation Society: “If the PUD is approved, long before the details of the project are fully flushed out, and certainly long before the neighbors, residents and commuters will know what will be happening, the conversation will be cut off, as once approved the PUD offers no further opportunity for review.”

o This statement is inaccurate. We have participated in dozens of public presentations with multiple organizations to date, most recently with the Harleston Village Neighborhood Association and the Charlestowne Neighborhood Association. We will continue to engage with citizens throughout the process. 

The Beach Company has submitted conceptual drawings at the request of the neighborhoods to help aid their understanding and encourage dialogue, but official and final construction plans cannot be created until zoning is approved. The project will still need to undergo TRC and BAR approvals, through which conversation will continue. For your clarification, on May 16, 2013, the Historic Charleston Foundation requested in writing that The Beach Company file for PUD zoning versus more typical MU-1 zoning, to provide more control over setbacks, open space, density, etc. After further meetings with the City planning staff, 

The Beach Company is no longer seeking to change the underlying zoning to MU-1.

• From the Preservation Society: “Residents will be prevented from helping shape any significant improvements to what is likely to be the largest, most-dense, most-impactful project ever conceived south of Calhoun Street.” 

o This statement is inaccurate. The statement ‘… largest, most-dense, most-impactful …' is an embellishment. The project is subject to all standard City of Charleston, public BAR and TRC review and approval processes. Residents are encouraged to participate in the BAR approval process.

• From the Preservation Society: “To meet zoning criteria for a PUD, the property must be rezoned to the ‘Urban Core' classification, the city's densest commercial designation.”

o The PUD calls for predominately residential uses.

o All the requirements of the City ordinances governing PUDs are satisfied.

o The Beach Company is requesting an amendment to the Century V Comprehensive Plan so that it is consistent with the PUD zoning.

• From the Preservation Society: “[The PUD] Allows for the removal of all trees on the property.”

o We will adhere to all standard mitigation requirements. In addition, the proposed plan includes 34% open space, which is 170% of the PUD open space requirements.

• From the Preservation Society: “The site will be removed from the Old City Height District, allowing developers to propose new heights far above other historic neighborhood heights downtown.”

o This statement is inaccurate. The intention of the PUD is to propose reduced heights from the current 14-story building. The proposed PUD limits heights based on four stories along the public right of ways, which is a well-established architectural form in downtown Charleston buildings. The plan proposes a maximum of seven stories on a portion of one building in the middle of the site.

• From the Preservation Society: “Developers may propose their own version of affordable housing.”

o The term “affordable housing” is never used within the PUD application and implies subsidized housing. The PUD submittal does not propose subsidized housing, but instead targets the Charleston peninsula workforce (people who live and work on the peninsula.) We are proposing approximately 9% of the rentals to be allotted for workforce housing including a range of rental options in line with the diversity of the Charleston business district's workforce.

• From the Preservation Society: “The PUD's traffic study is constructed on the minimum uses allowed, not the maximum, and assumes that 35% of inhabitants will not use cars.”

o This statement is inaccurate. The Beach Company conferred with City of Charleston prior to the traffic study to establish traffic assumptions, and as a result, the PUD traffic study is based upon maximum uses allowed.

The Position Statement and Advocacy Alert also fail to mention the concessions made by The Beach Company at the request of the Preservation Society and other interested parties. The concessions include: submitting conceptual design plans prior to zoning, providing increased parking ratios, proposing PUD zoning vs. MU-1, limited retail space, increased parking to avoid street parking, additional open space and the elimination of a 60,000 square foot office building.

As always, The Beach Company remains committed to transparency throughout the zoning and development process and will continue to seek and incorporate valuable input from the community. 

Sincerely,

John Darby

President and Chief Executive Officer

02/04/2015 | Preservation Society raises questions about companyss plans for Sergeant Jasper site

 
The planned development submitted by The Beach Company is drawing some complaints and a call to action from the Preservation Society of Charleston.
 
'If the Planned Unit Development is approved, long before the details of the project are fully flushed out and certainly long before any of the neighbors, residents and commuters will know what will be happening, the conversation will be cut off,' the preservation society said in a 10-page statement.
 
The preservation society says by wrapping the entire project into the PUD proposal, the zoning board and planning commission will approve the project in one move.
 
The preservation society said its members are studying the PUD application, but are concerned that the public will not have the same opportunity because the documents are not yet on the city's website and are only available at the planning office on Calhoun Street.
 
According to the preservation society, the proposal calls for 454 residential units, 35,000 square feet of non-residential space, and approximately 700 parking spaces.
 
The group says the existing Sergeant Jasper space had 225 apartments, 17,000 square feet of business space, and 180 parking spaces.
 
The group says the 35,000 square feet of non-residential space would be for a grocery store "that may operate 24 hours a day." It’s a concern for the preservation society because it could draw in people other than those immediately surrounding the property, the preservation society said.
 
"The Preservation Society believes that a 24-hour supermarket and 454 residential units will significantly and negatively impact the surrounding neighborhoods and further congest one of the primary vehicular arteries of the peninsula. We believe much of the traffic will be pushed into residential neighborhoods," officials said.
 
The preservation society went on to question how delivery trucks would make it into the area and handled once they arrive.
 
While The Beach Company is seeking to have the property designated as a PUD, the Preservation Society of Charleston says that's not allowed under the city's comprehensive Century V Plan.
 
The Preservation Society points out the Sergeant Jasper property sits between two historic neighborhoods, South of Broad and Harleston Village.
 
"The Society is strongly opposed to this request to reclassify the property as Urban Core in the Century V Plan, particularly as it is adjacent to the scenic, historic and important Ashley River and Colonial Lake. In addition, it is within a few feet of many important historic properties listed on the National Historic Register of Historic Places," officials said in the release.
 
The Beach Company responded to the Preservation Society's call to action on Thursday.
 
"Since 2006, The Beach Company has actively sought the feedback of the neighborhoods and community organizations with an interest in the redevelopment of the Sergeant Jasper property," the statement from the company reads. "Recently, some citizens have received inaccurate information, and we look forward to addressing concerns with a factual representation of the proposed plan at the Charleston Planning Commission meeting on Feb. 18."
 
On Friday, Corie Hipp, the co-president of Harleston Place, said the plans would create major traffic problems for an area already heavily trafficked. "We must stop unbridled growth on the news," Hipp said.
 
A hearing on the PUD application is set for Wednesday, Feb. 18 at 75 Calhoun Street.

09/12/2014 | Kristopher King takes over as Preservation Society's new director

The new executive director of the Preservation Society of Charleston already is a very familiar face on the city's preservation circles.
 
The society announced Friday that businessman and educator - and its current board president - Kristopher B. King will take the reins as the society's executive director effective Oct. 1.
 
As part of the transition, King stepped down as board president, and first vice president, J. Elizabeth Bradham has assumed that post.
 
King most recently worked as a principal in King Preservation Management, a residential and development firm, and he also has taught in the joint historic preservation program of the College of Charleston and Clemson.
 
King said he is excited for the chance to pursue his "greatest professional passion" - advocating for historic preservation and Charleston's quality of life.
 
"The Preservation Society has been at the forefront of the preservation movement since its inception in 1920, and I intend to use my experience, skills, and relationships in the community to ensure that the Society reaches new levels of success," he said.
 
King also has worked for the Historic Charleston Foundation and serves on the boards for Drayton Hall and the Charleston Civic Design Center.
 
Elizabeth Cahill, who chaired the society's search committee, said it was looking for an advocate, leader and fundraiser.
 
"In Kristopher, we have found all three," she said. "He has a passion for preservation and will be a superb champion of our advocacy work at this critical time in Charleston's history."
 
The Preservation Society of Charleston is the nation's oldest community-based preservation. It has worked with an interim director since Evan Thompson resigned earlier this year to lead Preservation Texas.